Distribution, Development, Stabilizer, and Consumers Areas of Livestock and Forages-Based Crops; An Emperical Status of Bordered Keerom Regency, West New Guinea-Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiip.2024.034.03.5Keywords:
Carrying capacity, keerom regency, livestock population structure, location quotient, stabilizer areasAbstract
Distribution, development, stabilizer, and consumer areas status of livestock development become the objective of this research. Little is known concerning the portrait of livestock production in the neighborhood region of Indonesia and Papua New Guinea such as Keerom Regency in Papua Province. The descriptive method employed was using desk study. The measured parameters were population structure, carrying capacity, regional development, and suitability commodity using LQ. The finding shows that Skanto and Arso Timur hold the first two districts with a high population of the goat. The 2 districts out of 11 districts have no swine recorded. The Skanto District has the highest cattle population recorded, i.e. 4136,38 AU, followed by Arso Timur, Arso, and Arso Barat. Production of fodder from crop yields is harvested from Senggi and Arso, followed by Skanto, Web, Arso Barat, Yaffi, and Arso Timur. Corn is the highest production of crops. Senggi can be a central of livestock development, followed by Arso, Skanto, Web, and Arso Barat. The KPPTR calculation for Keerom regency shows Web district has the highest value of 379.31 ST, while the lowest is Skanto. The goat sector from the point of agribusiness density shows optimum values reached by the Skanto district. The cattle sector from the point of regional density is dominantly shown by Arso Barat. The cattle sector from the point of economic density is dominantly shown by the Skanto district. The criterion found commonly is very dense compared to dense, medium, and rare. The total values of this finding range from 6 to 12 for EU, EW, and UW. In the EU, the WK (CA) of the three commodities is greater found, i.e. 18 areas compared to WPP (DDA) only found 13 areas. The figures for cattle are under 0,50, not achieving 1,00 and greater than that of 1,00. Only in the Skanto district, the LQ mark of the goat reached 0,539. However, swine is the common livestock raised by farmers in Keerom Regency.
References
Acebes, P., Iglesias-González, Z., & Muñoz-Galvez, F. J. (2021). Do traditional livestock systems fit into contemporary landscapes? Integrating social perceptions and values on landscape change. Agriculture, 11(11), 1107. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11111107.
Andaruisworo, S. (2021). Kebijakan pemerintah dalam upaya pengembangan sapi lokal (sapi bali) dalam menunjang pemenuhan kebutuhan protein hewani dan swasembada daging. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kesehatan, Sains dan Pembelajaran (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 788-793). https://doi.org/10.29407/seinkesjar.v1i1.1285
Brewer, K. M., & Gaudin, A. C. (2020). Potential of crop-livestock integration to enhance carbon sequestration and agroecosystem functioning in semi-arid croplands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 149, 107936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107936.
Crittenden, S. J. (2015). Biophysical soil quality of tillage systems in conventional and organic farming (Doctoral dissertation, Wageningen University and Research). Retrived from https://www.proquest.com/openview/89ce6af0d9318b533c189e2acc661c5e/1?cbl=2026366&diss=y&pq-origsite=gscholar.
Dumont, B., González-García, E., Thomas, M., Fortun-Lamothe, L., Ducrot, C., Dourmad, J. Y., & Tichit, M. (2014). Forty research issues for the redesign of animal production systems in the 21st century. Animal, 8(8), 1382-1393. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114001281.
Edi, D. N. (2020). Analisis potensi wilayah untuk pengembangan komoditas ternak ruminanisa di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual, 5(3), 562-572. https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v5i3.473
Faijah, N., & Wahbi, A. A. (2017). Metode spasial dalam memetakan sektor peternakan unggulan di Indonesia. JABE (Journal of Applied Business and Economic), 1(2), 135-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/jabe.v1i2.1394
Gizaw, S., Getachew, T., Goshme, S., Valle-Zárate, A., van Arendonk, J. A., Kemp, S., & Dessie, T. (2014). Efficiency of selection for body weight in a cooperative village breeding program of Menz sheep under smallholder farming system. Animal, 8(8), 1249-1254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113002024.
Gopar, R. A., Martono, S., Rofiq, M. N., & Windu, N. (2015). Potensi covercrop kebun sawit sebagai sumber pakan hijauan ternak ruminansia pada musim kemarau di Pelalawan, Riau. Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi Indonesia, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.29122/jsti.v17i1.3421.
Habsari, I. K., & Irwani, N. (2021). Analisis potensi wilayah untuk pengembangan ternak ruminansia di Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. PETERPAN (Jurnal Peternakan Terapan), 3(1), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.25181/peterpan.v3i1.2211
Henry, B. K., Eckard, R. J., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2018). Adaptation of ruminant livestock production systems to climate changes. Animal, 12(s2), s445-s456. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118001301
Khairiyakh, R., Irham., & Mulyo, J. H. (2015). Contribution of Agricultural Sector and Sub Sectors on Indonesian Economy. Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science) 18 (3): 150–59. https://doi.org/10.22146/ipas.10616
Leen, F., Van den Broeke, A., Aluwé, M., Lauwers, L., Millet, S., & Van Meensel, J. (2018). Stakeholder-driven modelling the impact of animal profile and market conditions on optimal delivery weight in growing-finishing pig production. Agricultural Systems, 162, 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.013
Mahlobo, B. T. (2016). Multi–criteria livestock assessment for sustainability of smallholder farms in Kwa-Zulu Natal (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University). Retrieved from https://scholar.sun.ac.za/items/ea2f0e00-fb5a-422f-ae33-2c5f970cb571.
Pagala, M. A., Zulkarnain, D., & Munadi, L. M. (2020). “Kapasitas daya tampung hijauan pakan ternak dan hasil ikutan perkebunan kelapa sawit di Kecamatan Tanggetada Kabupaten Kolaka. Jurnal Sosio Agribisnis 5 (2): 70–76. https://dx.doi.org/10.33772/jsa.v5i2.9918.
Paggasa, Y. (2017). Model usaha ternak integrasi sawit-ternak sapi potong di P4S Cahaya Purnama Kecamatan Bengalon Kabupaten Kutai Timur. Jurnal Pertanian Terpadu, 5(1), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.36084/jpt..v5i1.121
Purnomo, S. H., Sari, A. I., Emawati, S., & Rahayu, E. T. (2023, March). Analysis of Livestock Resources Potential for the Development of Beef Cattle in Mojogedang Sub-district, Karanganyar Regency. In 3rd International Conference on Environmentally Sustainable Animal Industry 2022 (ICESAI 2022) (pp. 446-454). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-116-6_55.
Rohaeni, E. S., Hartono, B., Fanani, Z., & Nugroho, B. A. (2014). Sustainability of cattle farming using analysis approach of Structural Equation Modeling (a study on dry land of Tanah Laut Regency, South Kalimantan, Indonesia). International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research (IJAAR), 4(1), 8-21. Retrieved from https://innspub.net/sustainability-of-cattle-farming-using-analysis-approach-of-structural-equation-modeling-a-study-on-dry-land-of-tanah-laut-regency-south-kalimantan-indonesia/
Rojas-Downing, M. M., Nejadhashemi, A. P., Harrigan, T., & Woznicki, S. A. (2017). Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Climate risk management, 16, 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001.
Rooduijn, B., Bongers, F., & van der Wal, H. (2018). Wild native trees in tropical homegardens of Southeast Mexico: Fostered by fragmentation, mediated by management. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 254, 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.015
Rusnan, H., Kaunang, Ch. L., and Tulung, Y. L. R. (2015). Analisis potensi dan strategi pengembangan sapi potong dengan pola integrasi kelapa–sapi di Kabupaten Halmahera Selatan Provinsi Maluku Utara. Zootec 35 (2): 187. https://doi.org/10.35792/zot.35.2.2015.7433.
Saade, A, Nur, M., & Sainar, S. (2017). Jagung sebagai pakan ternak di Kabupaten Pinrang. Jurnal Agrisistem 13 (2): 121–30. Retrieved from https://ejournal.polbangtan-gowa.ac.id/index.php/J-Agr-Sosekpenyuluhan/article/view/58/58
Shah, S., Moroca, A., & Bhat, J. A. (2018). Neo-traditional approaches for ensuring food security in Fiji Islands. Environmental Development, 28, 83-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2018.11.001.
Shirsath, P. B., Aggarwal, P. K., Thornton, P. K., & Dunnett, A. (2017). Prioritizing climate-smart agricultural land use options at a regional scale. Agricultural Systems, 151, 174-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.018.
Stellmacher, T., & Kelboro, G. (2019). Family farms, agricultural productivity, and the terrain of food (In) security in Ethiopia. Sustainability, 11(18), 4981. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184981
Sudipa, N. (2021). Status daya dukung lahan untuk keberlanjutan pangan di Kabupaten Klungkung. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 26(4), 597-604. https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.26.4.597.
Suryana, S., & Yasin, M. (2015). Prospek Pengembangan Integrasi Sawit-Sapi Di Kalimantan Selatan. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, 34(1), 30957. https://dx.doi.org/10.21082/jp3.v34n1.2015.p9-18.
Syamsu, J. A. (2018, November). Optimalisasi pemanfaatan limbah pertanian sebagai pakan sapi potong di peternakan rakyat. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Inovasi Teknologi Peternakan dalam Mendukung Terwujudnya Ketahanan Pangan Nasional. Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari (Vol. 17, pp. 1-10).
Syed, N. (2018). The Influence of Conservation Tillage and Conventional Tillage on Soil Bacterial Diversity in Southern Illinois. Dissertation of The University of Southern Mississippi. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/docview/2038370458?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses
Utami, A. S. J., & Pujiawati, Y. (2019). Potential of wasted crops and its carrying capacity for improving Bali Cattle Productivity case study in Bali Province. In International Seminar on Tropical Animal Production (ISTAP) (pp. 192-198). Retrieved from https://journal.ugm.ac.id/istapproceeding/article/viewFile/58244/28278
Vandermeulen, S., Ramírez-Restrepo, C. A., Beckers, Y., Claessens, H., & Bindelle, J. (2018). Agroforestry for ruminants: a review of trees and shrubs as fodder in silvopastoral temperate and tropical production systems. Animal Production Science, 58(5), 767-777. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16434.
van Wijk, M. T., Hammond, J., Frelat, R., & Fraval, S. (2019). Unequal access to land: Consequences for the food security of smallholder farmers in sub Saharan Africa. Encyclopedia of Food Security and Sustainability, 1, 556-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.22311-1.
Wenda, D., Hubeis, M., & Pandjaitan, N. H. (2019). Strategi pengembangan pasar usahatani pembesaran ternak babi di Kabupaten Tolikara, Papua. MANAJEMEN IKM: Jurnal Manajemen Pengembangan Industri Kecil Menengah, 14(2), 160-168..
W?odarczyk-Marciniak, R., Frankiewicz, P., & Krauze, K. (2020). Socio-cultural valuation of Polish agricultural landscape components by farmers and its consequences. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 190-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.017.
Yendraliza, Y., Magfirah, M., & Rodiallah, M. (2018). Struktur populasi dan potensi kecamatan benai di Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi untuk pengembangan sapi potong. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan, 21(2), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiiip.v21i2.6771
Yohanes, H., Muyan, Y., Rumetor, S., Palulungan, J. A., Baaka, A., Nurhayati, D., & Iyai, D. A. (2022). Asesmen produktivitas ternak dan kesesuaian potensi tanaman pertanian sebagai hijauan pakan: sebuah potret kawasan agro-ekologi dataran rendah selatan Merauke, Papua.. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia 27 (3): 429–33. https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.27.3.429.
Yusdja, Y., Ilham, N., & Sejati, W. K. (2003). Profil dan permasalahan peternakan. In Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi (Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 44-56). https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v21n1.2003.44-56.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mulyadi Mulyadi, Piter Gusbager, Meky Sagrim, Yubelince Yustencin Runtuboi, Deny Anjelus Iyai, Noveling Inriani, Alnita Baaka, Stepanus Pakage
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
