Policy Analysis and Role of Livestock Subsector in the Development at Purworejo Regency, Central Java

Authors

  • Agus Setiawan Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta
  • Budi Guntoro
  • F. Trisakti Haryadi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiip.2022.032.03.14

Keywords:

Policy analysis, Location quotient, Livestock sub-sector, Klassen typology

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the livestock subsector policy in Purworejo Regency in the 2016-2021 period and determine the leading subsector in the agricultural sector that can be developed in Purworejo Regency. This study uses descriptive analysis methods and quantitative analysis to determine the role of the livestock sub-sector by calculating Location Question (LQ), Shift Share (SS), and Klassen Typology. The results of this study indicate that policies in the livestock sub-sector, namely optimizing the livestock sub-sector and limiting large-scale livestock business activities in residential areas, are supported by 2 programs, namely the program to increase livestock production and the application of agricultural technology. The second policy is the application of superior agro-input and Agro Farm commodities supported by the Agricultural and Livestock Commodity Agribusiness program. The results of the Location Quotient (LQ) analysis of the livestock sub-sector are 1.24 including the base sector, meaning that the sector plays a more important role in the economy in an area compared to the area above it and is an important sub-sector in Purworejo district. The results of the shift-share analysis showed a negative result (-0.33) which was further analyzed by the Klassen Typology method, the livestock sub-sector is in quadrant III, which means it is a rapidly growing sub-sector but the sector's competitiveness is low compared to other sectors. This sector is included in the base sector, meaning that the sector plays a more important role in the economy in a region compared to the area above it and is an important sub-sector in the Purworejo district. The results of the shift-share analysis showed a negative result (-0.33) which was further analyzed by the Klassen Typology method, the livestock sub-sector is in quadrant III, which means it is a rapidly growing sub-sector but the sector's competitiveness is low compared to other sectors. This sector is included in the base sector, meaning that the sector plays a more important role in the economy in a region compared to the area above it and is an important sub-sector in the Purworejo district. The results of the shift-share analysis showed a negative result (-0.33) which was further analyzed by the Klassen Typology method, the livestock sub-sector is in quadrant III, which means it is a rapidly growing sub sector but the sector's competitiveness is low compared to other sectors.

References

BPS. 2022. Kabupaten Purworejo Dalam Angka 2022. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Purworejo

BPS. 2022. Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Kabupaten Purworejo Menurut Lapangan Usaha 2017-2021. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Purworejo

BPS. 2022. Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Provinsi Jawa Tengah Menurut Lapangan Usaha 2017-2021. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Tengah. ISSN: 2655-0741 Nomor Publikasi: 33000.2213

Dunn, William N. 1999. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Dye, Thomas R. 2013. Understanding Public Policy. Pearson, NJ.

Guimaraes, P., O. Figueiredo, & D. Woodward. 2009. Dartboard tests for the location quotient. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 39: 360–364.

Isbandi. 2017. Government Policy In Building Agribusiness of Agricultural and Livestock in Indonesia. The International Journal of Business and Management 5 (5). 89-94.

Mayulu, H., Sunarso, Sutrisno, C.I., Sumarsono. 2010. Kebijakan pengembangan peternakan sapi potong di Indonesia. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, 29(1), 34-41

Mayulu, H., Maulida, N., Yusuf, R., Rahmatullah, S.N., 2018. Effect of production cost on revenue of swamp buffalo farm business (Bubalus bubalis Linn.) in Hulu Sungai Utara Regency South Kalimantan Province. Jurnal Teknologi Pertanian Universitas Mulawarman, 13(2), 58-64.

Nugroho, Iwan & Rokhmin Dahuri. 2012. Pembangunan Wilayah: Perspektif Ekonomi, Sosial, dan Lingkungan. Jakarta: LP3ES

Rice, P. F. & M. J. Harton. (2010). Analysis of Recent Changes in Arkansas Personal Income 2007- 2009: A Shift Share Approach. Journal of Business Administration Online, 9(2):1-12

Sapriadi & Hasbullah. (2015) Analisis Penentuan Sektor Unggulan Perekonomian Kabupaten Bulukumba. Jurnal Iqtisaduna, 1, (1), 71-86

Saragih,J.T., dan Suryadi, E. 2014. Strategi Bersaing PT.PGN (Persero) Tbk. SBU Distribusi Wilayah 1. Jurnal Manajemen, Strategi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 8 92), 109-120.

Sjafrizal. 1997. Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Ketimpangan Regional Wilayah Indonesia Bagian Barat. Majalah Ekonomi Prisma LP3ES, 26,(3), 27-38

Sururi, Ahmad. 2016. Inovasi Kebijakan Publik (Tinjauan Konseptual dan Empiris). Jurnal Sawala Volume 4 Nomor 3 (September – Desember 2016): 1 - 14.

Yusdja, Y., Ilham, N., 2006. Arah Kebijakan Pembangunan Peternakan Rakyat. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian 4(1), 18-38.

Yulia, Lukman M. Baga, dan Netti Tinaprilla. 2015. Peran dan Strategi Pengembangan Subsektor Peternakan dalam Pembangunan Kabupaten Agam Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia (Vol 3 No 2, Desember 2015); 159-176

Widjaya, D.S.M. (2012) Analisis Penentuan Sektor Unggulan Perekonomian Wilayah Kabupaten Ngawi. Tesis Program Pascasarjana Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta

Downloads

Published

2022-12-29