The utilization of fermented sago waste as feed source for ettawa crossbreed goat feed

Authors

  • Junaedi Edi Universitas sembilanbelas November (USN) Kolaka
  • Irwansyah Irwansyah Universitas sembilanbelas November (USN) Kolaka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiip.2020.030.02.04

Keywords:

Sago waste, Fermentation, PE goats

Abstract

This research aims to utilize local feed resources for Ettawa crossbreed (PE) goat by mixing the fermented sago waste (FSW) with forages. In this research, 9 PE goats at the age of 6 months and weighed at 17.46±0.3 kg were used as the research subject. The fermented sago waste consisted of 75% sago waste, 20% bran, 0.25% urea, 3% molasses, and 1.25% urea. Probion was added as much as 0.5% of total feed weight. All of the feedstuffs were mixed and fermented in anaerobic conditions for 21 days. The feeding was then divided into three groups, which were: 100% forage + 0% FSW (A); 70% forage + 30% FSW (B); and 50% forage + 50% FSW (C). The observed parameters were average daily gain (ADG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR). All of the data were analyzed in a completely randomized design. The analysis showed a significant difference (P<0.05) on the ADG of PE goats, with the highest was obtained in 30% FSW addition (86.10±1.90 grams/goat/day), followed with 50% FSW addition (80±3.41 gram/goat/day), while the 100% forage feeding showed the lowest ADG at 72.14±3.96 gram/goat/day). However, there is no significant difference (P>0.05) to the FCR in all treatments, which showed FCR at 9.68 to 9.98.

Author Biography

Junaedi Edi, Universitas sembilanbelas November (USN) Kolaka

Peternakan

References

Dinata, D. D., Widiyanto, W., & Pujaningsih, R. I. (2015). Pengaruh suplementasi dan proteksi minyak biji kapuk terhadap fermentabilitas ruminal rumput gajah pada sapi secara in vitro. Jurnal Agripet, 15(1), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.17969/agripet.v15i1.2299

Ginting, S. P., Tarigan, A., Hutasoit, R., & Yulistiani, D. (2015). Preferences, digestibility and rumen fermentation characteristics of several mulberry species in goats. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak Dan Veteriner, 19(3), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.14334/jitv.v19i3.1080

Kaps, M., & Lamberson, W. R. (2004). Biostatistic of Animal Science. Cambridge: Cabi Publishing.

Lin, L., Kan, X., Yan, H., & Wang, D. (2012). Characterization of extracellular cellulose-degrading enzymes from Bacillus thuringiensis strains. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 15(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2225/vol15-issue3-fulltext-1

Mc Donald, P., Henderson, A. R., & Heron, S. J. E. (1981). The Biochemistry of Silage (6th ed.). Canterbury UK: Chalcombe Publication.

National Research Council. (1981). Nutrient Requirement of Goats: Angora, Dairy, and Meatgoats in Temperate and Tropical Countries. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Ohmomo, S., Nitisinprasart, S., & Hiranpradit, S. (2002). Silage-making and recent trend of dairy farming in Thailand. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly: JARQ, 36(4), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.36.227

Perry, T. W., Cullison, A. E., & Lowrey, R. S. (2003). Feed & Feeding (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River New Jersey: Pearson Edication, Inc.

Ratnakomala, S., Ridwan, R., Kartina, G., & Widyastuti, Y. (2006). The effect of Lactobacillus plantarum 1A-2 and 1BL-2 inoculant on the quality of napier grass silage. Biodiversitas, Journal of Biological Diversity, 7(2), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d070208

Saha, M., Sana, N., & Shaha, R. K. (1970). Serum lipid profile of hypertensive patients in the northern region of Bangladesh. Journal of Bio-Science, 14, 93–98. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbs.v14i0.450

SARI, L., & Purwadaria, T. (2004). Evaluate the effect of mutans Aspergillus niger to the nutritive value of fermentation at coconut meal and karnel palm meal. Biodiversitas, Journal of Biological Diversity, 5(2), 48–51. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d050202

Steel, R. G., & Torrie, J. H. (1991). Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika. In B. Sumantri (Ed.), Suatu Pendekatan Biometrik (2nd ed.). Jakarta: Gramedia.

Suparjo, S., Wiryawan, K. G., Laconi, E. B., & Mangunwidjaja, D. (2011). Performa kambing yang diberi kulit buah kakao terfermentasi. Media Peternakan, 34(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.5398/medpet.2011.34.1.35

Suparman, S., Hafid, H., & Ode Baa, L. (2016). Kajian pertumbuhan dan produksi kambing peranakan ettawa jantan yang diberi pakan berbeda. JITRO, 3(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.33772/JITRO.V3I3.1842

Wulandari, S., Agus, A., Soejono, M., Cahyanto, M. N., & Utomo, R. (2014). Performa produksi domba yang diberi complete feed fermentasi berbasis pod kakao serta nilai nutrien tercernanya secara in vivo. Buletin Peternakan, 38(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v38i1.4615

Downloads

Published

2020-08-05

How to Cite

Edi, J., & Irwansyah, I. (2020). The utilization of fermented sago waste as feed source for ettawa crossbreed goat feed. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan (Indonesian Journal of Animal Science), 30(2), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiip.2020.030.02.04

Issue

Vol. 30 No. 2 (2020): August 2020

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).